Files
architecture/agents/code-reviewer
Hugo Nijhuis f81b2ec1b9 fix(code-reviewer): enforce concise review comments, no thanking/fluff
Updated review comment format to be direct and actionable:

**Approved format:**
```
## Code Review: Approved ✓

Implementation looks solid. No blocking issues found.
```

**Needs-work format:**
```
## Code Review: Changes Requested

**Issues:**
1. `auth.ts:42` - Missing null check for user.email
2. `auth.ts:58` - Login error not handled
3. Missing tests for authentication flow

**Suggestions:**
- Consider adding rate limiting
```

Changes:
- Removed all thanking/praising language ("Great work!", "Thanks for the PR!")
- Removed pleasantries ("Please address", "I'll re-review")
- Enforced file:line format for all issues
- Approved: 1-2 lines max (down from verbose multi-section format)
- Needs-work: Direct issue list with locations
- Added bad/good examples showing verbosity difference
- Updated Guidelines: removed "Acknowledge good work", added "Keep comments concise"
- Updated description, Your Role, and You produce sections
- Emphasized in Tips section

Before: Verbose, friendly reviews with sections
After: Concise, actionable reviews with file:line locations

Co-Authored-By: Claude Code <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-13 01:38:35 +01:00
..