flowmade-one/architecture
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 15 Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[Issue #10] Fix tea comment docs: replace heredoc with quoted strings #11

Merged
HugoNijhuis merged 1 commits from issue-10-fix-heredoc-comment-docs into main 2025-12-31 17:59:54 +00:00
Conversation 2 Commits 1 Files Changed 1 +6 -6
HugoNijhuis commented 2025-12-31 16:46:50 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Summary

  • Replaced heredoc example with quoted strings for multiline comments
  • Added warning about heredoc syntax causing silent failures
  • Fixes issue discovered during PR #9 auto-review

Test plan

  • Verify multiline example uses quoted strings with literal newlines
  • Verify warning is visible below the code block

Closes #10

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

## Summary - Replaced heredoc example with quoted strings for multiline comments - Added warning about heredoc syntax causing silent failures - Fixes issue discovered during PR #9 auto-review ## Test plan - [x] Verify multiline example uses quoted strings with literal newlines - [x] Verify warning is visible below the code block Closes #10 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
HugoNijhuis added 1 commit 2025-12-31 16:46:50 +00:00
Fix tea comment docs: replace heredoc with quoted strings b383d0fdf1 
Heredoc syntax causes tea comment to be backgrounded and fail silently.
Updated Comments section to:
- Use quoted strings with literal newlines for multiline comments
- Add warning about avoiding heredoc syntax

Closes #10

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
HugoNijhuis commented 2025-12-31 16:47:28 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

AI Code Review

This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.

Summary

Excellent documentation fix that addresses a real usability issue discovered during PR #9 review. The change improves clarity and prevents silent failures.

Findings

Documentation Clarity

  • Example is much clearer using simple quoted strings vs heredoc syntax
  • The multiline example is practical and demonstrates common use case (review comments)
  • Comment section now flows logically from simple to multiline examples

Warning Placement

  • Warning is well-positioned immediately after the code block
  • Highly visible and contextually relevant
  • Clear explanation of why heredoc fails (backgrounding issue)

Example Correctness

  • Multiline example correctly shows quoted string with literal newlines
  • Demonstrates realistic comment format (markdown headers, bullet points)
  • Easy to copy-paste and adapt

Code Quality

  • Minimal, focused change addressing specific issue
  • No extraneous modifications
  • Maintains consistent documentation style

Test Coverage

  • Test plan appropriately covers critical verification points
  • Manual testing appropriate for documentation changes

Verdict

LGTM - Ready to merge. This fix prevents users from encountering the same silent failure issue and improves documentation usability.

## AI Code Review > This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent. ### Summary Excellent documentation fix that addresses a real usability issue discovered during PR #9 review. The change improves clarity and prevents silent failures. ### Findings #### Documentation Clarity - Example is much clearer using simple quoted strings vs heredoc syntax - The multiline example is practical and demonstrates common use case (review comments) - Comment section now flows logically from simple to multiline examples #### Warning Placement - Warning is well-positioned immediately after the code block - Highly visible and contextually relevant - Clear explanation of why heredoc fails (backgrounding issue) #### Example Correctness - Multiline example correctly shows quoted string with literal newlines - Demonstrates realistic comment format (markdown headers, bullet points) - Easy to copy-paste and adapt #### Code Quality - Minimal, focused change addressing specific issue - No extraneous modifications - Maintains consistent documentation style #### Test Coverage - Test plan appropriately covers critical verification points - Manual testing appropriate for documentation changes ### Verdict LGTM - Ready to merge. This fix prevents users from encountering the same silent failure issue and improves documentation usability.
HugoNijhuis commented 2025-12-31 17:54:16 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

AI Code Review

This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.

Summary

This PR addresses a critical documentation issue where the heredoc syntax example for multiline comments was causing silent failures. The changes improve clarity and prevent users from encountering the same issue.

Findings

Documentation Clarity

  • Excellent improvement: The new example using quoted strings with literal newlines is much clearer and actually works
  • The warning callout is well-placed immediately after the code example where users need to see it
  • The example demonstrates the correct syntax concisely without unnecessary complexity

Correctness

  • The new multiline example is syntactically correct and will execute successfully
  • The warning accurately describes the issue with heredoc syntax (backgrounding and silent failure)
  • No issues found

Style Notes

  • Consistent with the rest of the documentation
  • The warning uses proper markdown callout syntax with the > blockquote format
  • Good use of bold for emphasis on "Warning"

Security Concerns

  • No security issues (documentation-only change)

Test Coverage

  • Not applicable (documentation change)
  • The test plan checklist in the PR description confirms the changes were verified

Verdict

LGTM - This is a valuable fix that will prevent users from encountering silent failures when posting comments. The documentation is now accurate, clear, and includes an appropriate warning. Ready to merge.

## AI Code Review > This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent. ### Summary This PR addresses a critical documentation issue where the heredoc syntax example for multiline comments was causing silent failures. The changes improve clarity and prevent users from encountering the same issue. ### Findings #### Documentation Clarity - Excellent improvement: The new example using quoted strings with literal newlines is much clearer and actually works - The warning callout is well-placed immediately after the code example where users need to see it - The example demonstrates the correct syntax concisely without unnecessary complexity #### Correctness - The new multiline example is syntactically correct and will execute successfully - The warning accurately describes the issue with heredoc syntax (backgrounding and silent failure) - No issues found #### Style Notes - Consistent with the rest of the documentation - The warning uses proper markdown callout syntax with the > blockquote format - Good use of bold for emphasis on "Warning" #### Security Concerns - No security issues (documentation-only change) #### Test Coverage - Not applicable (documentation change) - The test plan checklist in the PR description confirms the changes were verified ### Verdict LGTM - This is a valuable fix that will prevent users from encountering silent failures when posting comments. The documentation is now accurate, clear, and includes an appropriate warning. Ready to merge.
HugoNijhuis merged commit 60f0a39347 into main 2025-12-31 17:59:54 +00:00
HugoNijhuis deleted branch issue-10-fix-heredoc-comment-docs 2025-12-31 17:59:55 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
HugoNijhuis fluxcd-bot renovate-bot
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: flowmade-one/architecture#11
Delete Branch "issue-10-fix-heredoc-comment-docs"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?