Clarifies /vision is for product-level vision, distinct from /manifesto
which handles organization-level vision.
Changes:
- Added architecture table showing org vs product vs goals levels
- Process now checks for manifesto first for org context
- Output format includes Organization Context section
- Guidelines clarify when to use /manifesto vs /vision
- Product personas/jobs extend (not duplicate) org-level ones
Closes#41🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.
Summary
This PR successfully establishes a clear hierarchy between organization-level manifesto and product-level vision. The architecture table is particularly effective at communicating the three-layer model.
Findings
Code Quality
Structure: Well organized with logical progression from context to process to output format
Architecture table: The expanded table (org/product/goals + commands) makes the relationship crystal clear
Process flow: Steps 1-5 properly sequence manifesto check → vision check → creation or display
Potential Bugs
No functional issues found. The command maintains backward compatibility while adding new context.
Documentation Completeness
Output format: Includes "Organization Context" section with manifesto reference
Milestone descriptions: Now show structured format (For:/Job:/Success:) which traces back to vision
Guidelines section: Properly distinguishes when to use /manifesto vs /vision
Architecture repo note: Smart addition - "If this is the architecture repo itself, use /manifesto instead"
Style Notes
Consistent with existing command documentation format
Markdown formatting is clean and readable
Verdict
LGTM
The hierarchy is clear, the distinction between /manifesto and /vision is well-articulated, and the output format properly references organization context. Ready to merge.
## AI Code Review
> This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.
### Summary
This PR successfully establishes a clear hierarchy between organization-level manifesto and product-level vision. The architecture table is particularly effective at communicating the three-layer model.
### Findings
#### Code Quality
- **Structure**: Well organized with logical progression from context to process to output format
- **Architecture table**: The expanded table (org/product/goals + commands) makes the relationship crystal clear
- **Process flow**: Steps 1-5 properly sequence manifesto check → vision check → creation or display
#### Potential Bugs
- No functional issues found. The command maintains backward compatibility while adding new context.
#### Documentation Completeness
- **Output format**: Includes "Organization Context" section with manifesto reference
- **Milestone descriptions**: Now show structured format (For:/Job:/Success:) which traces back to vision
- **Guidelines section**: Properly distinguishes when to use /manifesto vs /vision
- **Architecture repo note**: Smart addition - "If this is the architecture repo itself, use /manifesto instead"
#### Style Notes
- Consistent with existing command documentation format
- Markdown formatting is clean and readable
### Verdict
**LGTM**
The hierarchy is clear, the distinction between /manifesto and /vision is well-articulated, and the output format properly references organization context. Ready to merge.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Closes #41
Summary
Updates
/visioncommand to be explicitly product-level, distinct from/manifestowhich handles organization-level vision.Changes
/manifestovs/visionRelationship
/manifestomanifesto.md/visionvision.md/vision goalsTest Plan
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
AI Code Review
Summary
This PR successfully establishes a clear hierarchy between organization-level manifesto and product-level vision. The architecture table is particularly effective at communicating the three-layer model.
Findings
Code Quality
Potential Bugs
Documentation Completeness
Style Notes
Verdict
LGTM
The hierarchy is clear, the distinction between /manifesto and /vision is well-articulated, and the output format properly references organization context. Ready to merge.