Closes #43
## Summary
Restructures the vision-management skill to clearly distinguish between organization-level manifesto and product-level vision.
## Key Changes
- **Architecture table**: Shows Organization → Product → Goals with commands and locations
- **Manifesto section**: Structure, when to update, creation steps
- **Vision section**: Clarified as product-level, extends manifesto
- **Relationship diagram**: Shows inheritance model (personas, jobs, beliefs, principles, non-goals)
- **Example**: Demonstrates persona inheritance from org to product
- **Continuous improvement loop**: Updated to include retro → architecture repo → encoding flow
- **Quick reference table**: Common questions and answers
## Acceptance Criteria
- [x] Manifesto concept documented in skill
- [x] Vision clarified as product-level
- [x] Relationship between manifesto and vision explained
- [x] Clear guidance on when to use each
- [x] Examples of both
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Restructured skill to clearly distinguish:
- Manifesto: Organization-level (architecture repo)
- Vision: Product-level (product repos)
Key additions:
- Architecture table showing all three levels with commands
- Manifesto section with structure, when to update, creation steps
- Vision section clarified as product-level extending manifesto
- Relationship diagram showing inheritance model
- Example of persona inheritance (org → product)
- Continuous improvement loop including retro → encoding flow
- Quick reference table for common questions
Closes#43🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.
Summary
Excellent restructuring that clearly separates organizational identity (manifesto) from product direction (vision). The inheritance model and architecture table make the relationship immediately clear.
Findings
Code Quality
Architecture table (lines 12-17): Brilliant addition - shows the three-level hierarchy at a glance
Inheritance model diagram (lines 134-142): Makes abstract concepts concrete
Example section (lines 147-161): Demonstrates how product personas extend org personas effectively
Quick reference table (lines 229-238): Answers common questions upfront
Content Completeness
Covers all key aspects: when to update each level, creation steps, alignment checking
Continuous improvement loop updated to include architecture repo flow (lines 210-222)
Clear guidance on what goes where (beliefs in manifesto only, principles can be product-specific)
Potential Improvements
Minor: The "Relationship" section (lines 127-161) could benefit from a real-world example beyond personas - showing how a job-to-be-done flows from manifesto to vision would strengthen understanding
Documentation Style
Consistent markdown structure throughout
Good use of tables for scannable information
Progressive disclosure: high-level architecture first, then details
Verdict
LGTM
The manifesto/vision distinction is crystal clear. The inheritance model is well-explained with concrete examples. The architecture table and quick reference make this highly usable. Ready to merge.
## AI Code Review
> This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.
### Summary
Excellent restructuring that clearly separates organizational identity (manifesto) from product direction (vision). The inheritance model and architecture table make the relationship immediately clear.
### Findings
#### Code Quality
- **Architecture table** (lines 12-17): Brilliant addition - shows the three-level hierarchy at a glance
- **Inheritance model diagram** (lines 134-142): Makes abstract concepts concrete
- **Example section** (lines 147-161): Demonstrates how product personas extend org personas effectively
- **Quick reference table** (lines 229-238): Answers common questions upfront
#### Content Completeness
- Covers all key aspects: when to update each level, creation steps, alignment checking
- Continuous improvement loop updated to include architecture repo flow (lines 210-222)
- Clear guidance on what goes where (beliefs in manifesto only, principles can be product-specific)
#### Potential Improvements
- Minor: The "Relationship" section (lines 127-161) could benefit from a real-world example beyond personas - showing how a job-to-be-done flows from manifesto to vision would strengthen understanding
#### Documentation Style
- Consistent markdown structure throughout
- Good use of tables for scannable information
- Progressive disclosure: high-level architecture first, then details
### Verdict
**LGTM**
The manifesto/vision distinction is crystal clear. The inheritance model is well-explained with concrete examples. The architecture table and quick reference make this highly usable. Ready to merge.
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
Closes #43
Summary
Restructures the vision-management skill to clearly distinguish between organization-level manifesto and product-level vision.
Key Changes
Acceptance Criteria
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
AI Code Review
Summary
Excellent restructuring that clearly separates organizational identity (manifesto) from product direction (vision). The inheritance model and architecture table make the relationship immediately clear.
Findings
Code Quality
Content Completeness
Potential Improvements
Documentation Style
Verdict
LGTM
The manifesto/vision distinction is crystal clear. The inheritance model is well-explained with concrete examples. The architecture table and quick reference make this highly usable. Ready to merge.