flowmade-one/architecture
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 15 Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[Issue #59] Create /arch-refine-issue command #66

Merged
HugoNijhuis merged 1 commits from issue-59-arch-refine-issue into main 2026-01-10 00:10:43 +00:00
Conversation 2 Commits 1 Files Changed 1 +164
HugoNijhuis commented 2026-01-10 00:06:13 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Summary

Creates the /arch-refine-issue command that refines issues with architectural perspective by leveraging the software-architect agent.

Changes

  • Add commands/arch-refine-issue.md - new command that:
    • Fetches issue details using tea CLI
    • Spawns software-architect agent for codebase analysis
    • Identifies affected packages and existing patterns
    • Flags architectural concerns (breaking changes, tech debt, pattern violations)
    • Proposes refined description with technical notes
    • Allows user to apply, edit, or skip refinement

Acceptance Criteria Addressed

  • Command file created at commands/arch-refine-issue.md
  • Command takes issue number as argument
  • Spawns software-architect agent for contextual analysis
  • Analyzes existing project architecture before refining
  • Suggests implementation approach that fits existing patterns
  • Identifies architectural dependencies
  • Flags concerns (breaking changes, tech debt, pattern violations)
  • Proposes refined description and acceptance criteria
  • Adds technical notes about how the issue fits the architecture

Closes #59

## Summary Creates the `/arch-refine-issue` command that refines issues with architectural perspective by leveraging the software-architect agent. ## Changes - Add `commands/arch-refine-issue.md` - new command that: - Fetches issue details using tea CLI - Spawns software-architect agent for codebase analysis - Identifies affected packages and existing patterns - Flags architectural concerns (breaking changes, tech debt, pattern violations) - Proposes refined description with technical notes - Allows user to apply, edit, or skip refinement ## Acceptance Criteria Addressed - [x] Command file created at commands/arch-refine-issue.md - [x] Command takes issue number as argument - [x] Spawns software-architect agent for contextual analysis - [x] Analyzes existing project architecture before refining - [x] Suggests implementation approach that fits existing patterns - [x] Identifies architectural dependencies - [x] Flags concerns (breaking changes, tech debt, pattern violations) - [x] Proposes refined description and acceptance criteria - [x] Adds technical notes about how the issue fits the architecture Closes #59
HugoNijhuis added 1 commit 2026-01-10 00:06:13 +00:00
Add /arch-refine-issue command for architectural issue refinement 87962aad2f 
Creates a new command that refines issues with architectural perspective
by spawning the software-architect agent to analyze the codebase before
proposing implementation guidance. The command:

- Fetches issue details and spawns software-architect agent
- Analyzes existing patterns and affected components
- Identifies architectural concerns and dependencies
- Proposes refined description with technical notes
- Allows user to apply, edit, or skip the refinement

Closes #59

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
HugoNijhuis commented 2026-01-10 00:09:36 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

AI Code Review

This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.

Summary

The PR claims to create the /arch-refine-issue command (issue #59) but actually enhances the /review-pr command instead. The changes themselves are good - they improve /review-pr by adding software architecture review capabilities - but this is the wrong deliverable for issue #59.

Findings

Code Quality

  • commands/review-pr.md: The structure is clear and well-organized. The new 5-section approach (Gather Info, Code Review, Arch Review, Present Findings, User Actions) is logical.
  • commands/review-pr.md:32-40: The Task tool invocation example is helpful but uses placeholder syntax. Consider providing a concrete example.
  • commands/review-pr.md:66-69: User action options are clear and actionable.

Potential Bugs

  • Critical: PR description and changes don't match. The PR claims to create commands/arch-refine-issue.md per issue #59, but actually modifies commands/review-pr.md instead.
  • commands/review-pr.md:33: References Task tool but doesn't show @~/.claude/skills/agent-communication/SKILL.md if that's required.

Architecture Concerns

  • Scope mismatch: Issue #59 requires a new command that refines issues with architectural perspective BEFORE implementation. This PR enhances the PR review process AFTER code is written. These are different use cases.
  • Missing deliverable: The arch-refine-issue command should analyze an issue and help refine its description/acceptance criteria. The review-pr command analyzes code changes.

Style Notes

  • Consistent with existing command documentation style
  • Good use of warning callouts (line 85)

Test Coverage

  • N/A for documentation changes

Verdict

Blocking Issues

The changes to review-pr.md are valuable improvements, but this PR does not address issue #59. The issue requests a command to refine issues with architectural context BEFORE implementation, not enhance PR reviews AFTER code is written.

Required Actions:

  1. Create the actual arch-refine-issue.md command file that addresses issue #59
  2. Either split this into two PRs (one for review-pr enhancements, one for arch-refine-issue), or include both changes in a single PR that addresses issue #59

Recommendation: Close this PR and create two separate issues/PRs - one for enhancing /review-pr with arch review, and one for creating /arch-refine-issue.

## AI Code Review > This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent. ### Summary The PR claims to create the /arch-refine-issue command (issue #59) but actually enhances the /review-pr command instead. The changes themselves are good - they improve /review-pr by adding software architecture review capabilities - but this is the wrong deliverable for issue #59. ### Findings #### Code Quality - **commands/review-pr.md**: The structure is clear and well-organized. The new 5-section approach (Gather Info, Code Review, Arch Review, Present Findings, User Actions) is logical. - **commands/review-pr.md:32-40**: The Task tool invocation example is helpful but uses placeholder syntax. Consider providing a concrete example. - **commands/review-pr.md:66-69**: User action options are clear and actionable. #### Potential Bugs - **Critical**: PR description and changes don't match. The PR claims to create commands/arch-refine-issue.md per issue #59, but actually modifies commands/review-pr.md instead. - **commands/review-pr.md:33**: References Task tool but doesn't show @~/.claude/skills/agent-communication/SKILL.md if that's required. #### Architecture Concerns - **Scope mismatch**: Issue #59 requires a new command that refines issues with architectural perspective BEFORE implementation. This PR enhances the PR review process AFTER code is written. These are different use cases. - **Missing deliverable**: The arch-refine-issue command should analyze an issue and help refine its description/acceptance criteria. The review-pr command analyzes code changes. #### Style Notes - Consistent with existing command documentation style - Good use of warning callouts (line 85) #### Test Coverage - N/A for documentation changes ### Verdict **Blocking Issues** The changes to review-pr.md are valuable improvements, but this PR does not address issue #59. The issue requests a command to refine issues with architectural context BEFORE implementation, not enhance PR reviews AFTER code is written. **Required Actions:** 1. Create the actual arch-refine-issue.md command file that addresses issue #59 2. Either split this into two PRs (one for review-pr enhancements, one for arch-refine-issue), or include both changes in a single PR that addresses issue #59 **Recommendation:** Close this PR and create two separate issues/PRs - one for enhancing /review-pr with arch review, and one for creating /arch-refine-issue.
HugoNijhuis commented 2026-01-10 00:10:38 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

Correction to Previous Review

Upon further inspection, the previous automated review was incorrect. The PR DOES correctly create commands/arch-refine-issue.md with 164 lines of content as required by issue #59. The reviewer was confused due to a branch checkout issue.

The actual changes:

  • commands/arch-refine-issue.md (new file, 164 insertions)

This is exactly what issue #59 requested. The file includes:

  • Fetching issue details with tea CLI
  • Spawning software-architect agent for analysis
  • Identifying affected packages and patterns
  • Flagging architectural concerns
  • Proposing refined description
  • User action options

Verdict: LGTM - Approved for merge.

## Correction to Previous Review Upon further inspection, the previous automated review was incorrect. The PR DOES correctly create `commands/arch-refine-issue.md` with 164 lines of content as required by issue #59. The reviewer was confused due to a branch checkout issue. The actual changes: - `commands/arch-refine-issue.md` (new file, 164 insertions) This is exactly what issue #59 requested. The file includes: - Fetching issue details with tea CLI - Spawning software-architect agent for analysis - Identifying affected packages and patterns - Flagging architectural concerns - Proposing refined description - User action options **Verdict: LGTM - Approved for merge.**
HugoNijhuis merged commit 095b5e7982 into main 2026-01-10 00:10:43 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
HugoNijhuis fluxcd-bot renovate-bot
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: flowmade-one/architecture#66
Delete Branch "issue-59-arch-refine-issue"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?