Set explicit model preferences to optimize for speed vs capability: - haiku: 11 commands, 2 agents (issue-worker, pr-fixer), 10 skills Fast execution for straightforward tasks - sonnet: 4 commands (groom, improve, plan-issues, review-pr), 1 agent (code-reviewer) Better judgment for analysis and review tasks - opus: 2 commands (arch-refine-issue, arch-review-repo), 1 agent (software-architect) Deep reasoning for architectural analysis Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
68 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
description: Plan and create issues for a feature or improvement. Breaks down work into well-structured issues with vision alignment.
|
|
model: sonnet
|
|
argument-hint: <feature-description>
|
|
context: fork
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Plan Feature: $1
|
|
|
|
@~/.claude/skills/gitea/SKILL.md
|
|
@~/.claude/skills/roadmap-planning/SKILL.md
|
|
@~/.claude/skills/issue-writing/SKILL.md
|
|
@~/.claude/skills/vision-management/SKILL.md
|
|
|
|
1. **Check vision context**: If `vision.md` exists, read it to understand personas, jobs to be done, and goals
|
|
2. **Identify persona**: Which persona does "$1" serve?
|
|
3. **Identify job**: Which job to be done does this enable?
|
|
4. **Understand the feature**: Analyze what "$1" involves
|
|
5. **Explore the codebase** if needed to understand context
|
|
|
|
6. **Discovery phase**: Before proposing issues, walk through the user workflow:
|
|
- Who is the specific user?
|
|
- What is their goal?
|
|
- What is their step-by-step workflow to reach that goal?
|
|
- What exists today?
|
|
- Where does the workflow break or have gaps?
|
|
- What's the MVP that delivers value?
|
|
|
|
Present this as a workflow walkthrough before proposing any issues.
|
|
|
|
7. **Break down** into discrete, actionable issues:
|
|
- Derive issues from the workflow gaps identified in discovery
|
|
- Each issue should be independently completable
|
|
- Clear dependencies between issues
|
|
- Appropriate scope (not too big, not too small)
|
|
|
|
8. **Present the plan** (include vision alignment if vision exists):
|
|
```
|
|
## Proposed Issues for: $1
|
|
|
|
For: [Persona name]
|
|
Job: "[Job to be done this enables]"
|
|
Supports: [Milestone/Goal name]
|
|
|
|
1. [Title] - Brief description
|
|
Addresses gap: [which workflow gap this solves]
|
|
Dependencies: none
|
|
|
|
2. [Title] - Brief description
|
|
Addresses gap: [which workflow gap this solves]
|
|
Dependencies: #1
|
|
|
|
3. [Title] - Brief description
|
|
Addresses gap: [which workflow gap this solves]
|
|
Dependencies: #1, #2
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
If the feature doesn't align with any persona/job/goal, note this and ask if:
|
|
- A new persona or job should be added to the vision
|
|
- A new milestone should be created
|
|
- This should be added as a non-goal
|
|
- Proceed anyway (with justification)
|
|
|
|
9. **Ask for approval** before creating issues
|
|
10. **Create issues** in dependency order (blockers first)
|
|
11. **Link dependencies** using `tea issues deps add <issue> <blocker>` for each dependency
|
|
12. **Present summary** with links to created issues and dependency graph
|