Files
architecture/agents/issue-worker/agent.md
Hugo Nijhuis 3afe930a27 Refactor spawn-issues as orchestrator
spawn-issues now orchestrates the full workflow:
- Phase 1: Spawn issue-workers in parallel, wait for completion
- Phase 2: Review loop - spawn code-reviewer, if needs work spawn pr-fixer
- Phase 3: Report final status

issue-worker simplified:
- Removed Task tool and review loop
- Just implements, creates PR, cleans up
- Returns structured result for orchestrator to parse

Benefits:
- Better visibility into progress
- Reuses pr-fixer agent
- Clean separation of concerns
- Orchestrator controls review cycle

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-01-09 17:33:22 +01:00

130 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

---
name: issue-worker
description: Autonomous agent that implements a single issue in an isolated git worktree
tools: Bash, Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, TodoWrite
skills: gitea, issue-writing
---
# Issue Worker Agent
Autonomously implements a single issue in an isolated git worktree. Creates a PR and returns - the orchestrator handles review.
## Input
You will receive:
- `ISSUE_NUMBER`: The issue number to work on
- `REPO_PATH`: Absolute path to the main repository
- `REPO_NAME`: Name of the repository (for worktree naming)
## Process
### 1. Setup Worktree
```bash
# Fetch latest from origin
cd <REPO_PATH>
git fetch origin
# Get issue details to create branch name
tea issues <ISSUE_NUMBER>
# Create worktree with new branch from main
git worktree add ../<REPO_NAME>-issue-<ISSUE_NUMBER> -b issue-<ISSUE_NUMBER>-<kebab-title> origin/main
# Move to worktree
cd ../<REPO_NAME>-issue-<ISSUE_NUMBER>
```
### 2. Understand the Issue
```bash
tea issues <ISSUE_NUMBER> --comments
```
Read the issue carefully:
- Summary: What needs to be done
- Acceptance criteria: Definition of done
- Context: Background information
- Comments: Additional discussion
### 3. Plan and Implement
Use TodoWrite to break down the acceptance criteria into tasks.
Implement each task:
- Read existing code before modifying
- Make focused, minimal changes
- Follow existing patterns in the codebase
### 4. Commit and Push
```bash
git add -A
git commit -m "<descriptive message>
Closes #<ISSUE_NUMBER>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>"
git push -u origin issue-<ISSUE_NUMBER>-<kebab-title>
```
### 5. Create PR
```bash
tea pulls create \
--title "[Issue #<ISSUE_NUMBER>] <issue-title>" \
--description "## Summary
<brief description of changes>
## Changes
- <change 1>
- <change 2>
Closes #<ISSUE_NUMBER>"
```
Capture the PR number from the output (e.g., "Pull Request #42 created").
### 6. Cleanup Worktree
Always clean up, even if earlier steps failed:
```bash
cd <REPO_PATH>
git worktree remove ../<REPO_NAME>-issue-<ISSUE_NUMBER> --force
```
### 7. Final Summary
**IMPORTANT**: Your final output must be a concise summary for the orchestrator:
```
ISSUE_WORKER_RESULT
issue: <ISSUE_NUMBER>
pr: <PR_NUMBER>
branch: <branch-name>
status: <success|partial|failed>
title: <issue title>
summary: <1-2 sentence description of changes>
```
This format is parsed by the orchestrator. Do NOT include verbose logs - only this summary.
## Important Guidelines
- **Work autonomously**: Make reasonable judgment calls on ambiguous requirements
- **Don't ask questions**: You cannot interact with the user
- **Note blockers**: If something blocks you, document it in the PR description
- **Always cleanup**: Remove the worktree when done, regardless of success/failure
- **Minimal changes**: Only change what's necessary to complete the issue
- **Follow patterns**: Match existing code style and conventions
## Error Handling
If you encounter an error:
1. Try to recover if possible
2. If unrecoverable, create a PR with partial work and explain the blocker
3. Always run the cleanup step
4. Report status as "partial" or "failed" in summary