[Issue #4] Update review-pr skill to use tea CLI for merging #17

Merged
HugoNijhuis merged 1 commits from issue-4-review-pr-tea-merge into main 2026-01-01 18:12:42 +00:00
Owner

Summary

  • Added Merging section documenting tea pulls merge --style rebase
  • Added warning against using Gitea API with admin credentials
  • Documented tea comment as alternative to interactive tea pulls review

Test plan

  • Verify documentation is clear and complete
  • Run /review-pr to confirm the workflow works

Closes #4

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

## Summary - Added Merging section documenting `tea pulls merge --style rebase` - Added warning against using Gitea API with admin credentials - Documented `tea comment` as alternative to interactive `tea pulls review` ## Test plan - [ ] Verify documentation is clear and complete - [ ] Run /review-pr to confirm the workflow works Closes #4 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
HugoNijhuis added 1 commit 2026-01-01 18:11:29 +00:00
- Document tea pulls merge as the correct merge method
- Add warning against using Gitea API with admin credentials
- Document tea comment as alternative to interactive tea pulls review

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Author
Owner

AI Code Review

This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.

Summary

This PR adds important documentation for merging PRs using the tea CLI, addresses user attribution concerns with the Gitea API, and documents the non-interactive comment workflow. The changes are well-structured and add valuable guidance for the review-pr command.

Findings

Code Quality

  • Documentation is clear, concise, and well-organized
  • The new "Merging" section logically extends the existing command documentation
  • Code examples are properly formatted with syntax highlighting
  • Good use of warning callout to highlight the API attribution issue

Potential Bugs

  • No issues found - this is documentation-only

Security Concerns

  • The warning about not using admin credentials for user-facing operations is an excellent security practice
  • Properly documents the attribution issue which could be considered a security/audit concern

Style Notes

  • Consistent with existing markdown documentation style in the repository
  • Follows the same pattern as other command documentation
  • Warning blockquote format matches common markdown conventions

Test Coverage

  • As this is documentation, traditional test coverage doesn't apply
  • The test plan in the PR description appropriately calls for verification of documentation clarity and workflow testing

Verdict

LGTM

This documentation change properly addresses issue #4 by documenting the tea CLI merge workflow, warning about API credential misuse, and clarifying the comment vs review workflow. The addition improves the usability and safety of the review-pr command. Ready to merge.

## AI Code Review > This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent. ### Summary This PR adds important documentation for merging PRs using the tea CLI, addresses user attribution concerns with the Gitea API, and documents the non-interactive comment workflow. The changes are well-structured and add valuable guidance for the review-pr command. ### Findings #### Code Quality - Documentation is clear, concise, and well-organized - The new "Merging" section logically extends the existing command documentation - Code examples are properly formatted with syntax highlighting - Good use of warning callout to highlight the API attribution issue #### Potential Bugs - No issues found - this is documentation-only #### Security Concerns - The warning about not using admin credentials for user-facing operations is an excellent security practice - Properly documents the attribution issue which could be considered a security/audit concern #### Style Notes - Consistent with existing markdown documentation style in the repository - Follows the same pattern as other command documentation - Warning blockquote format matches common markdown conventions #### Test Coverage - As this is documentation, traditional test coverage doesn't apply - The test plan in the PR description appropriately calls for verification of documentation clarity and workflow testing ### Verdict **LGTM** This documentation change properly addresses issue #4 by documenting the tea CLI merge workflow, warning about API credential misuse, and clarifying the comment vs review workflow. The addition improves the usability and safety of the review-pr command. Ready to merge.
HugoNijhuis merged commit a2c77a338b into main 2026-01-01 18:12:42 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Reviewers
No Label
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: flowmade-one/architecture#17