flowmade-one/architecture
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 15 Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[Issue #60] Enhance /review-pr with software architecture review #67

Merged
HugoNijhuis merged 1 commits from issue-60-enhance-review-pr-architecture into main 2026-01-10 00:09:51 +00:00
Conversation 1 Commits 1 Files Changed 1 +52 -5
HugoNijhuis commented 2026-01-10 00:06:34 +00:00
Owner
Copy Link

Summary

Enhances the /review-pr command to include software architecture review as part of the standard PR review process for code PRs.

Changes

  • Added reference to software-architecture skill for access to patterns and checklists
  • Added section to spawn software-architect agent for deep architectural analysis
  • Added architecture review checks: pattern consistency, dependency direction, breaking changes, module boundaries, error handling
  • Restructured review output with separate Code Review and Architecture Review sections
  • Added numbered steps for clearer workflow

Closes #60

## Summary Enhances the `/review-pr` command to include software architecture review as part of the standard PR review process for code PRs. ## Changes - Added reference to software-architecture skill for access to patterns and checklists - Added section to spawn software-architect agent for deep architectural analysis - Added architecture review checks: pattern consistency, dependency direction, breaking changes, module boundaries, error handling - Restructured review output with separate Code Review and Architecture Review sections - Added numbered steps for clearer workflow Closes #60
HugoNijhuis added 1 commit 2026-01-10 00:06:34 +00:00
Enhance /review-pr with software architecture review 0f91ec73aa 
Add software architecture review as a standard part of PR review process:
- Reference software-architecture skill for patterns and checklists
- Spawn software-architect agent for architectural analysis
- Add checks for pattern consistency, dependency direction, breaking changes,
  module boundaries, and error handling
- Structure review output with separate Code Review and Architecture Review
  sections

Closes #60

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
HugoNijhuis commented 2026-01-10 00:09:46 +00:00
Author
Owner
Copy Link

AI Code Review

This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent.

Summary

Enhances /review-pr command to include software architecture review alongside code review. Changes add the software-architecture skill reference, spawn instructions for software-architect agent, and restructure the output into separate code review and architecture review sections. The enhancement properly addresses issue #60 and its acceptance criteria.

Findings

Code Quality

  • Strong: Clear numbered step structure improves readability
  • Strong: Appropriate skill references added
  • Concern: Task tool invocation syntax in lines 32-40 uses markdown code block format, but the Task tool is invoked as a function call, not via markdown. The current syntax is instructional text for the AI, not executable code. This is actually CORRECT for a command file - it's guidance, not literal invocation syntax. No issue here.
  • Good: Architecture review checks are well-defined and align with the skill

Potential Bugs

  • Minor: No error handling guidance if software-architect agent fails or is blocked. Consider adding a note about what to do if the agent can't complete analysis.
  • No other logic errors identified

Security Concerns

  • No security concerns identified

Style Notes

  • Consistent with existing command structure and formatting
  • Good use of markdown sections and bullet points
  • Clear separation of concerns between steps

Test Coverage

  • Command files are procedural instructions and don't have traditional test coverage
  • The command can be validated by running it on a sample PR

Architecture Impact

  • Strong: Properly references the software-architecture skill
  • Strong: Correct agent reference path
  • Strong: Well-structured integration of two review types
  • Good: Preserves existing merge workflow and user attribution patterns
  • Suggestion: Consider adding a note in section 4 about how to handle cases where architecture review is not applicable (e.g., documentation-only PRs)

Verdict

LGTM

The changes successfully implement the requirements from issue #60. All acceptance criteria are addressed:

  • References software-architecture skill ✓
  • Spawns software-architect agent ✓
  • Checks pattern consistency ✓
  • Verifies dependency direction ✓
  • Flags breaking changes ✓
  • Assesses module boundaries ✓
  • Checks error handling ✓
  • Includes both review types ✓

The implementation is solid with only minor suggestions for enhancement. Ready to merge.

## AI Code Review > This is an automated review generated by the code-reviewer agent. ### Summary Enhances /review-pr command to include software architecture review alongside code review. Changes add the software-architecture skill reference, spawn instructions for software-architect agent, and restructure the output into separate code review and architecture review sections. The enhancement properly addresses issue #60 and its acceptance criteria. ### Findings #### Code Quality - **Strong:** Clear numbered step structure improves readability - **Strong:** Appropriate skill references added - **Concern:** Task tool invocation syntax in lines 32-40 uses markdown code block format, but the Task tool is invoked as a function call, not via markdown. The current syntax is instructional text for the AI, not executable code. This is actually CORRECT for a command file - it's guidance, not literal invocation syntax. No issue here. - **Good:** Architecture review checks are well-defined and align with the skill #### Potential Bugs - **Minor:** No error handling guidance if software-architect agent fails or is blocked. Consider adding a note about what to do if the agent can't complete analysis. - No other logic errors identified #### Security Concerns - No security concerns identified #### Style Notes - Consistent with existing command structure and formatting - Good use of markdown sections and bullet points - Clear separation of concerns between steps #### Test Coverage - Command files are procedural instructions and don't have traditional test coverage - The command can be validated by running it on a sample PR #### Architecture Impact - **Strong:** Properly references the software-architecture skill - **Strong:** Correct agent reference path - **Strong:** Well-structured integration of two review types - **Good:** Preserves existing merge workflow and user attribution patterns - **Suggestion:** Consider adding a note in section 4 about how to handle cases where architecture review is not applicable (e.g., documentation-only PRs) ### Verdict **LGTM** The changes successfully implement the requirements from issue #60. All acceptance criteria are addressed: - References software-architecture skill ✓ - Spawns software-architect agent ✓ - Checks pattern consistency ✓ - Verifies dependency direction ✓ - Flags breaking changes ✓ - Assesses module boundaries ✓ - Checks error handling ✓ - Includes both review types ✓ The implementation is solid with only minor suggestions for enhancement. Ready to merge.
HugoNijhuis merged commit 8f0b50b9ce into main 2026-01-10 00:09:51 +00:00
Sign in to join this conversation.
Reviewers
No Reviewers
Labels
No items
No Label
Milestone
No items
No Milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
HugoNijhuis fluxcd-bot renovate-bot
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: flowmade-one/architecture#67
Delete Branch "issue-60-enhance-review-pr-architecture"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?